Author: thearabchildren » Sun Jun 12, 2011 6:10 pm
So the AKP, CHP and BDP "independents" all made gains, but the BDP "independents failed to reach the (pointless and illogical) 10% cutoff for parliamentary representation. The MHP got less votes than last time, but still has enough to be in parliament. Obviously these elections don't actually change anything, and if the people were active enough outside of elections we could ignore them entirely. That being said, here is who I blame for the results. J'accuse!
1. The AKP, for its control of the Turkish media. It is able to cover up its lies, betrayals and nepotism, as well as magnify those of its opponents.
2. The BDP, for its two-facedness. It has no clear political programme (are they for autonomy or independence?) or strategy (if they were boycotting the elections, why run the so-called "independents"? If they were not boycotting the elections, same question).
But most of all I blame:
3. The CHP. For being behind the original constitution which introduced the concept of a percentage cutoff for parliamentary representation, and for its connections to the one-party period. For its general support for militarism which continues to this day, and for its authoritarian roots which make much of the Turkish masses accepting of the authoritarian methods of the AKP (as though arrests of journalists and censorship and state control of the media and schools is anything new, not to mention all the Kurdish children locked up in the Southeast, the AKP didn't start that). For its fake secularism (Kılıçdaroğlu's being an Alevi does NOT erase the years of state support for Sunni Islam at the expense of the Alevis, and it is CENTRE TO RIGHT WING Alevis who support the CHP, NOT "the Alevis") and its fake love for the Kurds (why is Kılıçdaroğlu so afraid to speak for Kurdish rights? Why did the CHP take down the Kurdish signs in Dersim? This waffling alienates both Turks and Kurds, and benifits no one). In general I blame Kılıçdaroğlu most of all, he is supposed to be a fresh face of the CHP, but he only brings back a few centre Leftists and assimilated Kurds and those most afraid of the AKP. He glorifies coup-supporters as he pretends to distance himself from Baykal (who everyone knows is right there next to him). He is too weak to insult Kerdoğan as often and strongly as he deserves, and he presents no alternative, not enough for so-called "social democracy".
And I do not blame:
Foreigners. Not because there aren't FILTHY foreign roles in Turkish politics (the US, Saudi Arabia, and the Zionist state especially), but because these roles are largely unchanged, unlike the three political movements mentioned above, and if any of those had changed for the better, they could present a real challenge to the foreign meddling.
Questions, comments, angry corrections?