They do like journalists : just copying some texts without veryfying their relevances ? You claim that I can't talk about Yezidism because you suppose I am not a specialist of Ancient history : well as I'm graduated of the School of Louvre Museum (Art, Civilisation and History), I know a bit about ancient history of Mesopotamia, be sure, even if my speciality is Islamic Middle-Ages, especially 11th-13th century of ME and it's the time of Yezidism fundation) and you used writings of a NGO which has nothing to do with history ? be logical !
I is well known that Yezidism, or Zoroastrianism, being one of the oldest religions of the Middle East, has greatly influenced the history of mankind. The truth, always
Of course not. Iranian groups came in Mesopotamia during the 1st M, around 8th century BC. The oldest well-known religion and civilisation in the area was in Sumer, for they wrote their beliefs. We know nothing about ancient cults in Northern Mesopotamia at Sumer's time (around 3000 BC). And Sumerian were neither Semitic nor Iranian and have nothing to do with your ancestors.
Then this paper is valueless, lacking of the slightest knowledge about mesopotamian civilisation.









