Author: Londoner » Tue May 06, 2014 5:23 pm
Anthea wrote:Londoner wrote:This invented electric generator as described from the link bellow, doesn't need fuel input. This is what the inventor claims. As you can not create something from nothing, so this generator must have a sort of input. So what it could be? It is not mechanical. A mechanical system must have fuel input. So it must be a chemical system or a battery. Battery-generated electricity is a lot more expensive than fuel-generated electricity. So while fuel exists and affordable, this invention doesn't have a commercial future.
Good luck to the inventor.
http://peyamner.com/PNAnews.aspx?ID=337578
I was intrigued so enlarged the photo and discovered it was a chimney generator so something has to pass through it
I think that I have found it
Enter this into urlhttp://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?kh=-1&uddg=h ... 451%2F6557Or click on link below:http://www.slideshare.net/AlexanderDeck ... generationThis is a circular generator but I am sure it works in a similar - you willunderstand the technological specifications I cannot

You are right there is a pipe on the wall. The probability is very high that this pipe acts as a sort of chimney. But this is not a chimney generator. If it was the pipe would have needed to be bigger not than the machine but than the room, which they are inside, to produce any power. I can see a bottle of gas in the room. I suspect it uses gas. Possibly the inventor doesn't think of gas a s a fuel. Usually fuel means petrol mainly.
Chimney generator in the link unlike home square type chimneys, is circular. The inventor thinks that is an advantage. The inventor expects the sun to heat up the air inside the chimney to create an upward air current to run a generator. It does work but practically it is useless. to light up a diode, you need a chimney bigger than a house. A small solar panel can generate a power thousands of time bigger than the power generated by chimney generator, the size of a house.