this topic is being SLOWLY edited

[Anthea]

Why has not the Kurdish People been able
to establish its own state yet?

It has been centuries and the Kurdish People suffers from a struggle for existence and living with dignity and national, human and civil liberties, fighting against occupation. The life of the Kurdish individuals in many places and times almost resembles that of slavery or even worse because slaves are allowed to be called so while a Kurd in his own homeland Kurdistan is denied the right of being described as Kurdish and even after the liberation of Southern Kurdistan from the dictatorship of Baath the Kurdish people there still do not have an identity card saying that they are Kurds as the Iraqi passport that after the liberation is issued in Sulaimany or Hawler in Arbic language and not Kurdish and says that the holder is an Iraqi.

While in Britain even dogs and cats have something round their necks indicating whether it is a dog or a cat, the Kurds have not reached that level yet. This situation is a result of deep studies in to the Kurdish society by the countries that occupy Kurdistan making the Kurdish people incapable of demanding its right to establish a Kurdish state. They have done this by wasting the time and energy of the Kurdish people on secondary issues such as: the thing that occupies the time of more than 20 million Kurds in Northern Kurdistan is freedom for Mr Abdullah Ocalan from his imprisonment and it is likely to be so even after his death.

Also the Kurds in Western Kurdistan are occupied most with reinstating the Syrian nationality to the Kurds who have been deprived from it for half a century and this situation may last for another half a century. The Kurdish people in Southern Kurdistan are mostly occupied with the Article 140 of the Iraqi constitution while in Eastern Kurdistan they are busy with refusing Ahmadi Nejad and demanding another President that could be even more dictatorial. In reality these are all careful plans by the countries occupying Kurdistan in order to engage the Kurdish people away from its main objective which is the liberation of Kurdistan and not Ocalan, demanding a Kurdish nationality and not Syrian, carrying out Article 64 of the Sevres Treaty and not Article 140 and lastly working towards the rule of Kurdistan by the Kurdish people and not Ahmadi Najad
or any one else. Wasting the energies of the Kurdish people on such things has dire consequences for the future of the Kurdish people and its national security, because the time wasted in such a way makes the Kurds the victims of a never ending vicious
circle.

2
It is true that the international and regional policies especially of those countries that occupy Kurdistan was always and still is against the establishment of a Kurdish state but despite this huge animosity towards a Kurdish state the struggle of the Kurds is
still going on with ups and downs. The struggle has materialised in the great Kurdish revolutions in all parts of Kurdistan that all were for the independence of Kurdistan and establishment of the Kurdish state, such as the revolution of the Baban Princedom, revolution of Badinan Princedom, revolution of Botan Princedom,
revolution of Sheik Obeidullah Nehri, revolu
tions of Ismael Agha Shikak, revolution
of Ibrahim Pasha Milli, revol
ution of Sheik Saeed Piran,
revolutions of Mardisian
Tribe, revolutions of Barzan and others...
Some of these revolutions and uprisings
managed to establish Kurdish states in one
of the regions of Kurdistan such as the
Kingdom of Southern Kurdistan headed
by the King of Kurdistan Sheik Mahmoud
Hafid 1919 – 1924 and others as Kurdish gove
rnments such as the one formed by
Khoiboon Party during its revolution in Nort
hern Kurdistan under the leadership of
General Ihsan Nouri Pasha 1927
– 1930, or others as the Kurdish Republic in Eastern
Kurdistan formed by the President of Kurdistan Qazi Muhammad in 1946.
These states, kingdoms and republics despite
their mistakes and failures became an
inspiration for all liberty loving
revolutionaries of Kurdistan.
However, half a century ago and with es
tablishment of the Democratic Party of
Kurdistan and its quick spread in all parts
of Kurdistan as if supported by states and
governments similar to the spread of th
e yellow and green flags, and since the
beginning the Democratic Party of Kurdista
n adopted the Marxist theories of Lenin
that ignore the role of the Sheiks, Mullas,
Agas, tribal chieftain and personalities of
the Kurdish villages and towns for no reas
on other than being rich, and relying on
labourers and proletariat just because they
are poor according to th
e Marxist theories.
In fact at the time there was not any bourge
oisie or proletariat in Kurdistan such as
Lenin spoke about and the reason for this tu
rning upside down of the Kurdish society
was in order to created a situation and
not allow the Sheiks, Mullas, Agas and
chieftains to lead the Kurdish revolution
as all the Kurdish revolutions under the
leadership of those were for the establishmen
t of a Kurdish state. For the same unholy
reason Micaville theories also were adopted
that if you want to
destroy a people
diminish its good people and n
obility or at least ignore th
em and bring those persons
who have no effect in building a society
and its history. So as an example the
Democratic Party of Kurdistan since its
establishment started a campaign of
propaganda and lies against
Sheik Mahmoud Hafid the King of Kurdistan describing
him as reactionary and backwards and refusi
ng to shake hands with the British High
Commissioner, which was the main factor for
the Kurdish people to lose its state and
other such nonsense. The truth is exac
tly the opposite as it was Sheik Mahmoud
Hafid who announced the establishm
ent of Kurdistan Kingdom under the
bombardment of British planes while thos
e who make false pr
opaganda against him
are now under the protection of British a
nd American planes, yet they cannot
announce a state in Southern Kurdistan such
that of the glorious Sheik Mahmoud a
hundred years ago, so who
is the real backwards!!!
3
Also the Democratic Party of Kurdistan
of Iran when it starte
d its revolution in
Eastern Kurdistan after the Khomeini’s uprisi
ng the first thing they did was to arrest
Ali Qazi the only son of the president of
the Kurdistan Republic
Qazi Muhammad and
handed him over to the
government in Baghdad.
Also in Syria and Turkey the Democratic Part
y of Kurdistan diminished the role of the
Kurdish nobility so that if th
e opportunity arises they woul
d not be able to lead the
people and establish a Kurdish state as th
ey did before, and thus the leadership
remains in the hands of the Democratic
Party of Kurdistan and other parties and
organisations affiliated to it, according to
a plan that has been made for them in
Damascus, Baghdad, Ankara a
nd Tehran to destroy any revolution or uprising that
may enhance the chances of a Ku
rdish state. There are a lot
of examples for this but I
mention just a few:
A lot of times some freedom loving peopl
e of Kurdistan described the Democratic
Party of Kurdistan as a traitor because of
its practices and collaboration with one or
the other of the states occupying Kurdistan
while fighting against another one of the
occupiers as this policy led to internal
Kurds against Kurds fighting and caused the
lives of the best political a
nd military experts of the Kurdis
h people in order to satisfy
the states that occupy Kurdistan. As the
thoughts and organisations of the Democratic
Party of Kurdistan are in all parts of Kurdista
n each one of them had a different ally at
one time but in reality these were differen
ces in form and the essence remains that
they are all allied with those countries th
at occupy Kurdistan and helping one group
against the other.
The Democratic Party of Kurdistan did not
punish those collaborators and traitors
against the Kurdish people at
all for the crimes they comm
itted especially in hindering
the Kurdish revolutions and moreover, order
were issued for their amnesty and were
given the highest of jobs
and pensions several times
more than those of the
Peshmarga.
Also whenever there was an
international or regional
opportunity for the Kurdish
people to gain independence the Democratic
Party of Kurdistan created an internal
conflict with the other partie
s that would not cease until the
opportunity is over. Such
as in the sixties when Iraq was week and
with no chemical or any sophisticated
weapons but the internal Kurdish – Kurdish
fighting was so intense that the Kurdish
revolution became a victim of a prank by
the Mars 1970 Declaration that in reality
wanted to destroy the revolu
tion. And because that the
revolution was already fallen
for the trick that ends it the internal fi
ghting was no longer necessary, so it stopped.
Another chance for independence came with th
e start of Iran Iraq war that lasted 8
years and again instead of taking advantage of
the fact that two o
ccupiers of Kurdistan
are fighting each other the parties started
another internal Kurdish – Kurdish fighting
that did not stop until the Iraq Iran war ende
d. Only then the Ku
rdish parties declared
a Kurdistan Front that was supposed to be
announced at the start and not the end of
the war.
There was also the opportunity of the Ku
rdish uprising of 1991 and the exodus of
millions of Kurds to outside the borders of
Sykes – Picot or even outside the borders