Author: Rando » Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:01 pm
Not only does this contribute to the "Slice up countries" interest of US,but it also expands its influence in syria itself.
wouldn`t an allawite state make Syria landlocked?
wouldn`t that be in US interest? A small state like the allawite next to a huge (compared to itself) barbarian state make it desperate after allies,and i don`t believe US would miss this opportunity. It could influence allawite state and "control" it,making syria very dependent on US/allawite state for acsess to the sea.
it can`t look north for a route to the sea either without bumping into US,since turkey is also a US "puppet".
and south is jordan and israel,both have good relations with US.
And to the east is iraq (and kurdistan,but we can`t give them accsess to the sea),but when maliki is gone i don`t think iraq will support syria. i heard terrorist groups from syria is entering iraq to kill iraqs. That wont have a good effect on iraq-syria relations. This would make syria dependent on US and therefore become pro-US.
Syria wouldn`t be able to use force against the allawite state,since it is a ally of US. it would be the same as the iraqi invasion of kuwait. US would retaliate with its military.
im not sure how big US influence is in lebanon is nor do i know anything about Syrian-lebenese relatons.
i haven`t been updated on whats happening in syria lately,and the theory above is just what i think would be logical. if anything new have happend in syria or the theory above isn`t possible,please post i reply about what have happend or why that theory isn`t possible.
When injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty.