
Djembe wrote:
There are many indications that BDP, maybe not officially, but there are many who are not declaring the objective of independence and uniting Kurdistan. Here is the 'psych' of a typical Kemalist (lol). We should not give any freedom to 'Mountain Kurds', they will want more. Or, we should have a bargain in a position, even though, 'Mountain Kurds (this is a sarcasm ok) deserve their cultural rights, democratic rights, we should not give them, because they will want more. So give them little, because that is how we bargain.
So this trust issue actually creating 'biggest obstacle' or 'block' to improve Kurdish rights support from Turkish side. But that is another story.
I say, you are miscalculating the warfare. Remember you are not fighting with Iraq. Your enemy now is Turkey which is one of the biggest NATO army and strongest Army in the region. Do not talk about 20,000 tribe men guerrilla warfare. Turkey can not be brutal to PKK as they would be in classic warfare. Southern Iraq has population which is almost as big as Turkish Army or Iranian army ready to destroy you within a week.
This is another miscalculation, in my opinion. Arabs may have competition within, but once it is time to take care of 'Northern problem', they will show their muscle. The only reason Souther Kurdistan exist now, the way they are is 'occupation'.
I am not sure about 4250 GDP per capita, it is little too much. And you have oil but if you can't sell it what is the point to have. How are you going to sell it when you depending on Turkey.
Can you correct the statement above. I think there is some typo.
Well, I think you stolen :) this from Turkish language. Anyway, many Kurds have different priorities. I have even Kurdish in my family who do not really have any 'nationalist' ideas. I can see you do but people are different.
If they don't want to live in Turkey you can't force them.
Ohhh, I'm so scared, the fascist Turk talks about his western backed Army, these kind of talks will not scare us there are several factors that you have not taken into considration:-
1. An attack on southern Kurdistan, will cause a massive backlash from the population in Anatolia, you then will have huge problems in Anatolia, and the longer that lasts the more trouble your in, you will possibly face other problems from other minorities. You will possibly face an insurgency style war from the Kurds there, similar to what the US has been facing in Iraq.
2. What makes you think the world will just stand by and let you attack? for example, as I recall in 2007 the Iranian puppet Al-sader was going crazy and was threatening Turkey with his militia if they invaded to deep, that suggests that Iran was not happy about it.
3. We have a lot of gas, and gas the the EU wants as we've signed a contract with RWE (one of the nabucco members) and so, what make you think the EU will just watch you invade?
The odds are against Turkey, becuase in the eyes of the world you will look like the aggressor attacking the pro-Western Iraqi Kurds (As that's the image we have now)
The Iraqi army too is split in loyalty for example the sunni have their own divisions, the shia have several divisions that are broke up into several several other shia groups (i.e. Maliki, Al-sader) and these guys are hostile to each other too, we also have 2 divisions in the Iraqi army whom are loyal to Kurdistan, also we have 10,000 soldiers in Baghdad protecting the green zone, and they form the presidential brigades, some of the most elite in Iraq, so any way on us will cause great tensions.
Besides, what makes you think the US will fully pull out? they still have troops in Germany.
Stop talking about things you don't have a clue about, seriously.... the KRG has a GDP that is 25% higher than Iraqs $3537 and we can always sell to china via Iran, so if the west wants our oil they will deal with you, becuase don't forget the biggest investor in the KRG is sinopec (big Chinese oily)
No typo, google it. "Turks don't like anyone"
I told, when people are occupied that is bound to happen, and I've seen it all before, in the 80's saddam had many Kurds on his side and they said no to independence blah blah blah, as soon as the US invaded with in a second the left his army and joined the rebellion.


Djembe wrote:
Ideas. You did not address to the point I am raising. First of all, it is not clear majority nationalist Kurdish people in northern Kurdistan want independence. My points was that, Nationalist Kurdish people not being honest is one of the many obstacles why today's Kurdish people in Turkey do not get more cultural, democratic and political rights. They hijack want to hijack the social consensus on improvement on these rights, because basically their agenda is not improvement of these rights, they want ultimate independence.
Yes, I agree on you that, Turkey while can destroy the Kurdish army in classical war, they can't win the war against rebel warfare in the long run. However, they will not lose either. The conflict would continue but I can't predict the out come of this but if Turkey does not lose this would end up with the independence of northern Kurdistan. Do you think all of the Kurdish population is motivated and ready to have long war to accomplish the independence? Do you have full confidence for this?
I did not understand. I am not seeing any conflict between Al-Sader or Iran vs Turkey because of Kurd. And who says, Turkey will invade Southern Kurdistan. That is not something they would do. They just advance into southern Kurdistan, win the war and withdraw. They know they can't afford long term invasion in Southern Iraq. Yes, there will be pressure form EU like they did put pressure on Cyprus as well. But like I said, Turkey would not invade Southern Kurdistan for long term. They would just win the war and make sure such 'united Kurdistan' does not happen and withdraw. They would make sure, Iraqi arabs advance in Southern Kurdistan and change the power shift in key cities i.e. Kirkuk.
Protesting Turkey's shelling of northern Iraq, radical cleric
Muqtada al-Sadr warned Sunday that Iraqis would not remain silent in the
face of Ankara's "transgressions"
Ideas. I say you are very optimistic about western. Turkey is a big and strong country. They are the member of NATO, they are the candidate of EU. Kurds will not win war against Turkey. They invaded northern Cyprus. What happen? It is legitimate Turkey to take action against any move that would take land from Turkey.
Like I said, this is hypothetical question, my objective is trying to predict what would happen for potential uniting Kurdistan move. Try to see me as devil advocate.
Ideas. The hypothetical situation is the attempt to 'unite Kurdistan'. If such move happen, current only Kurdish entity Southern Kurdistan will have to deal with Iran, Turkey, Syria and Iraq. You are ignoring the fact that you would be fighting on many fronts.
Why would Iran help you if you want to take a piece from their land as part of united Kurdistan?
I take it as a emotional statement, rather than logical one. In diplomacy there is not 'liking'. it is all about interests. Do you think USA likes Kurds? Do you think USA and Turkey are ally because they like each other.
I guess Kurds have to thank to US a lot. But remember. US economy, power is on decline. Turkey is on its way becoming the 10th largest economy on the earth. And may I also remind you that Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Syria will be on the neighborhood forever, and USA may vacant the property.

Kulka wrote:kak Ideas, dont dare to insult turk here, only turk has the right to insult people, calling them sociopath, psychopath or whatever. i recommend you my dear brother to leave it - he represents the "big and strong"country - which if EU let it to join would be the one of the poorest member of EU. "Big and strong"
country who must use chemical weapon, coz cant win with kurdish girls and boys in mountains in other way. "big and strong'
country who are scared to give basic human rights to a people who must live within its unlegal borders. "big and strong'
country which would be nothing without kurdish territory, thats why is doing everything - using bastards methods - to keep kurdish land in their hands.





Kulka wrote:i didnt deleted any of my post - i dont have any reason to feel ambarased, and show where you found this idiot statement that turkya is on 6th place, maybe here:
http://www.aneki.com/countries2.php?t=R ... pe_richest
Turkey is the 6th largest economy in EU after Germany, France, UK, Italy and Spain.



Djembe wrote:Kulka wrote:i didnt deleted any of my post - i dont have any reason to feel ambarased, and show where you found this idiot statement that turkya is on 6th place, maybe here:
http://www.aneki.com/countries2.php?t=R ... pe_richest
Who is idiot?
I clearly stated the '6th largest economy in EU'Turkey is the 6th largest economy in EU after Germany, France, UK, Italy and Spain.
And you come up with GDP per capita statistics. Do you even have a primary education to know the difference between GDP per capita versus GDP?


Registered users: Bing [Bot]